Rosenfeld, Meters. J. (2010, April). Appointment online: An upswing of the Web sites due to the fact a personal mediator. Presentation during the People Association off The usa Conferences, Dallas, Texas. [ Hyperlinks ]
Shtatfeld, Roentgen., & Barak, Good. (2009). Factors connected with launching social connectivity into the Adult dating sites: A standpoint from the personal change concept. Interpersona: A worldwide Record into the Private Matchmaking, step 3, 19-37. [ Hyperlinks ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Just who connectivity whom? Informative homophily into the on line lover alternatives. Eu Sociological Feedback. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ views toward aspects of destination in order to an almost other. Societal Psychology Every Polska kvinnliga personer quarter, 61, 287-300. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Exactly what keeps hitched couples interested in each other? Free Inquiry in Innovative Sociology, twenty-six, 193-two hundred. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of detected correspondence to own romantic and relationship attraction feel during a rating-acquainted with date. Character and you will Societal Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The new determine regarding moms and dads and you can nearest and dearest on the quality and you may stability off personal matchmaking: Good three-revolution longitudinal study. Diary regarding ily, 54, 888-900. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Intimate partners’ perceptions off social media characteristics into passing of time and dating transitions. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Meters. C. (2002). Social networking sites and alter within the individual relationship. Into the A good. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & Yards. An excellent. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Stability and change in the Relationship (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge School Push. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Taste several things (in a few some body) more than anybody else: Partner tastes into the close matchmaking and you will friendships. Journal from Social and personal Relationship, 19, 463-481. [ Website links ]
Personal Relationship, seven, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, E. (2008). For the S. Sprecher, A great. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Manual from relationships initiation (pp. 249-265). Ny: Mindset Push/Taylor & Francis. [ Website links ]
Straaten, We., Engles, Roentgen. C. M. Elizabeth., Finkenauer, C., & The netherlands, R. W. (2009). Appointment your suits: Exactly how elegance similarity influences strategy choices within the blended-sex dyads. Identity and Social Therapy Bulletin, thirty-five, 685-697. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Miller, G. Roentgen. (1981). New character off initial discussions within the determining attraction in order to equivalent and different strangers. Human Telecommunications Research, 8, 16-twenty-five. [ Backlinks ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, An excellent. (2004). Initially: Chronic relational negative effects of score-acquainted conversations. Record out-of Personal and private Dating, 21, 361-379. [ Website links ]
Tenny, E. R., Turkheimer, Elizabeth., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Are enjoyed is over with good personality: New part of coordinating. Log regarding Research within the Identity, 43, 479-585. [ Website links ]
Vangelisti, An effective. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). Brand new Cambridge guide from personal matchmaking. Cambridge School Force. [ Backlinks ]
Thebusinessoflove: Relationship initiation from the Websites matchmaking qualities
Walster, Grams.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Need for actual elegance inside dating behavior. Record out-of Identity and you may Social Therapy, 4, 508-516. [ Backlinks ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A beneficial., Simms, Age N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Match firms and you will deal breakers: Analyses away from assortative mating when you look at the newlywed people. Log out of Identification, 72, 1029-1068. [ Links ]
Whisman, M. A good., Seashore, S. Roentgen. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Was relationship discord taxonic and will taxonic standing feel assessed reliably? Comes from a national, representative decide to try out-of married people. Journal from Contacting and you will Logical Mindset, 76, 745-755. [ Website links ]