Cerni, T., Di Benedetto, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2021). New contribution out-of personality and you will intelligence toward cognitive competences in the high degree. Frontiers within the Psychology, several, 2566.
Damian, Roentgen. I., Spengler, M., Sutu, An effective., & Roberts, B. W. (2019). 16 happening sixty-six: Good longitudinal study of personality balance and alter all over 50 years. Log from Personality and Public Therapy, 117(3), 674.
Daurio, An effective. Meters., & Taylor, J. (2022). A study of your own triarchic model of psychopathy and you can self-claimed Group B identity problems traits. Identity Disorders: Principle, Search, and you can Treatment, 13(2), 153.
Furnham, A great., & Monsen, J. (2009). Character traits and you may intelligence expect educational college levels. Studying and you may private distinctions, 19(1), 28-33.
Haider, Z. F., & von Stumm, S. (2022). Forecasting instructional and you may societal–emotional outcomes from inside the growing adulthood out-of intelligence, identification, and you may socioeconomic reputation. Record regarding Identity and Personal Mindset.
Holland, A good. S., & Roisman, Grams. We. (2008). Huge Five characteristics and you may relationships high quality: Self-said, observational, and psychological proof. Diary off Personal and private Relationships, 25(5), 811-829.
Holley, P., Yabiku, S., & Benin, Meters. (2006). The partnership anywhere between intelligence and you can divorce. Record out-of kissbrides.com cliquez ici pour enquГЄter Friends Facts, 27(12), 1723-1748.
Hong-Hua, Y., Wen-Qing, F., & Shu-Qiao, Y. (2006). Symptomatology from Group-B Character Problems about Five-Grounds Design Position. Chinese Psychological state Diary.
Kassenboehmer, S. C., Leung, F., & Schurer, S. (2018). College or university education and you will non-intellectual ability innovation. Oxford Financial Paperwork, 70(2), 538-562.
Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The newest perception of parents’ and you can spouses’ degree into breakup rates for the Norway. Market research, ten, 121-142.
Mathes, E. W., Brennan, S. Meters., Haugen, P. Meters., & Rice, H. B. (1985). Evaluations of bodily attractiveness since a purpose of decades. This new Journal regarding Personal Therapy, 125(2), 157-168.
Lover really worth get decline (or perhaps not), but it does not appear to be a boundary to help you relationships formation
McGue, Yards., Anderson, Age. L., Willoughby, E., Giannelis, A beneficial., Iacono, W. G., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Not by the grams alone: The great benefits of a college education certainly people who have low levels regarding general cognitive ability. Intelligence, ninety-five, 101642.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, Yards. D., Carter, M. S., & Hinsz, V. B. (2010). Was social some one significantly more stunning? A zero-associate data out-of agreeableness, extraversion, and you can attractiveness. Journal away from Look in Personality, 44(2), 293-296.
Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). The newest telecommunications ranging from university impoverishment and agreeableness for the anticipating instructional attainment. Personality and you will Private Distinctions, 127, 85-88.
Standard qualities of identification and you can affectivity because the predictors from fulfillment during the romantic dating: Research out of mind?and mate?feedback
Tatarunaite, Age., Playle, R., Hood, K., Shaw, W., & Richmond, S. (2005). Face appeal: a great longitudinal investigation. American Log regarding Orthodontics and you will Dentofacial Orthopedics, 127(6), 676-682.
Sarah Flooding, Miriam King, Renae Rodgers, Steven Ruggles, J. Robert Warren and Michael Westberry. Provided Social Use Microdata Series, Newest Populace Survey: Version ten.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS, 2022.
Scott, S. B., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Allen, Age. S., & ). Aspects of divorce proceedings and memory out-of premarital input: Implications to have boosting dating education. Couple and you can Members of the family Psychology: Lookup and exercise, 2(2), 131.
Solomon, B. C., & Jackson, J. J. (2014). So why do characteristics anticipate divorce proceedings? Multiple pathways courtesy fulfillment. Log of Identification and Public Therapy, 106(6), 978.
Vernon, P. An excellent., Villani, V. C., Vickers, L. C., & Harris, J. A good. (2008). A behavioural genetic studies of Ebony Triad in addition to Larger 5. Character and personal Variations, 44(2), 445-452.
Widiger, T. A beneficial., Sellbom, Yards., Chmielewski, Meters., Clark, L. A great., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, Roentgen., … & Wright, Good. G. (2019). Identification for the an excellent hierarchical model of psychopathology. Scientific Emotional Technology, 7(1), 77-ninety five.
The modern CPS studies don’t let you know when your chance of divorce is actually ingredient. Interactions you may imply blended marriage ceremonies provides large otherwise down dangers than simply the sum of the dangers of a couple people. not, past browse towards breakup and you may degree indicates that it’s (Lyngstad, 2004). The latest divorce or separation risk for a few PhD people means 15%, similar to the private danger of eight-8% to have private PhD people.
Buss, D. Meters., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). This new lover modifying hypothesis. Identification and Personal Distinctions, 104, 143-149.